The Four Color Theorem: The Mathematical Puzzle Behind Map Coloring

## 5. Criticisms and Controversies Surrounding the Proof

Advertisement

Though revolutionary, the computer-assisted proof of the Four Colour Theorem was not without controversy and detractors. Mathematical proofs using computers begged basic problems about the nature of mathematical truth, the place of human intelligence in mathematics, and the very definition of what counts as a good mathematical proof. Mathematical philosophy and practice still today are shaped by these discussions. One of the main complaints was the absence of human verifiability. Usually built in a way that lets other mathematicians personally verify each step, traditional mathematical proofs guarantee the correctness of the argument via human reasoning. But the computer-assisted proof of the Four Colour Theorem included computations and checks beyond reasonable human confirmation. This made some mathematicians wonder whether such a proof could be regarded as really rigors. They maintained that a proof might not be a real mathematical proof in the conventional sense if it cannot be totally comprehended and validated by a human intellect. The lack of insight the evidence offered added still another source of conflict. Proofs are valued by many mathematicians not just for their results but also for the insight and intuition they offer on the topic and connected mathematical ideas. With its thorough verification of thousands of cases, the computer-assisted proof lacked the kind of exquisite, conceptual clarity many mathematicians yearn for. While the evidence might have answered the question of whether the theorem was true, critics contended that it lacked a deeper knowledge of why it was correct, a necessary component of mathematical discovery. Reliability of the computer programmes applied in the proof also raised questions. Critics said that the programmes themselves can have flaws or mistakes, so negating the whole evidence. Although attempts were made to confirm the programmes and cross-check data, the complexity of the work meant that some degree of doubt lingered. This posed issues regarding the concept of certainty in mathematics and whether a proof based on maybe unreliable technology can be regarded as totally definitive. Some mathematicians objected philosophically, claiming that human reason and knowledge define mathematics fundamentally. They argued that a demonstration that a human mind cannot completely understand might not be a real mathematical proof. From this point of view, mathematics is not only a tool for problem-solving but also an especially human activity that ought to be reachable for human intellect. The debate also included mathematical reproducibility and accessibility concerns. Not all mathematicians have access to the strong computers required to confirm the argument, therefore casting doubt on the democratisation of mathematical knowledge. This sparked debates on whether it was reasonable for some proofs to call on specific technology resources or if mathematical truths should be verified by every member of the mathematical community. Notwithstanding these objections, most of the mathematical community finally approved of the evidence. Many recognised that some problems might be too complicated for conventional human-only proofs and considered it as a required progression in mathematical practice. Acceptance of the Four Colour Theorem's proof cleared the path for subsequent computer-assisted proofs and helped to produce increasingly advanced proof-checking tools. The debate over the validity of the Four Colour Theorem sparked more general conversations on the direction mathematics would take in the computer era. It spurred discussions on the use of computers in mathematical research and teaching as well as on whether computer-assisted proofs should be handled differently than conventional proofs. These debates still go today as mathematicians work on ever more difficult issues challenging human comprehension. A seminal case in these continuous discussions on the nature of mathematical truth and the instruments we employ to find it is the Four Colour Theorem proof. It has made mathematicians rethink what a valid proof is and resulted in fresh ideas in mathematical education combining computational thinking with conventional analytical techniques.